when Glenn Beck conceals facts or states things as fact that are untrue, are those lies?

Do you think that someone who has the attention of so many viewers is obliged to check facts and admit the whole truth?

Beck is a con artist, a lunatic, and a shill for whatever puts a few bucks in his pockets.

He “leaves out” more facts than he includes. His idiotic “Constitutional” rants are particularly hilarious to those of
us who took extensive law courses, completely fraudulent and erroneous, and downright demented.

The multi-episode rant that Nazis and Fascists are and were “left wing” and “liberal” was so specious and spurious, it defies description, not to mention the entire body of scholarly, witness, and analyst literature not only disagrees, but paints him as the lying, maggot weasel he is.

Diego Rivera was, of course, a die hard Marxist, but he also confined himself in that mural to a “worker’s tale” and fussed a great deal to make it acceptable to the capitalists, and Beck’s description of the symbols was downright fakery and fraud, full explained in the art literature, which of course, Beck did not even acknowledge. I think Rivera’s statement was something like , “To a worker, not every brick need carry the message of the movement!”…

He hasn’t the credentials to spew his filth, and he has no portfolio.

He’s never done service of any kind, military or civilian, and his knowledge of most everything is very weak. He barely got out of high school, and while his ability to make up insane interpretations on the fly is kind of startling, his grounding in truth in reality is very weak.

In short, he IS a liar. Worse, he’s either crazy, or figures he can make lots of money pretending to be nuts. It comes down to the same thing.

Keith Olbermann Slams Glenn Beck’s “Communist” Rockefeller Center

Comments are closed